Monday, April 28, 2014

Identify Theft Meets eFiling: Protecting Sensitive Data in Pleadings



What’s a lawyer to do?

Texas statutes require that all pleading include certain identifying information for named parties: full legal names, portions of social security numbers, and portions of drivers’ license numbers, while family law matters include dates of birth, dates of marriage, maiden names, home addresses, vehicle identification numbers, or even bank names and partial account numbers in orders related to the parties’ property.

Obviously, that type of “sensitive data” in a publicly available record could lead to identity theft by the unscrupulous. And most pleadings are publicly available documents.

In an effort to address this problem, the Texas Supreme Court has issued new rules to require that all lawyers (and perhaps even private parties acting without a lawyer) electronically file and serve most pleadings, including family law matters, AFTER removing (redacting) sensitive data. “Sensitive data” includes the names and addresses of minor children, as well as financial account numbers, social security numbers, and driver’s license numbers. See Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 21, 21a & 21c (effective January 1, 2014).

However, the Supreme Court’s rules cannot trump the Legislature’s statutes.

The clerks of each court are trying to determine how to comply with these competing requirements. Before filing any pleading, particularly in matters under the Texas Family Code, be sure to check with the appropriate clerk’s office to see whether they have adopted any local rules or procedures for handling “sensitive data.”

By:  Cynthia W. Veidt, cindy@lpvlaw.com

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Effect of Powerball/Lotto Win on Child Support Obligations?



A recent Powerball winner may be about to find out that winning isn’t everything, after all.

According to news sources, Pedro Quezada, a resident of New Jersey, owes a judgment for unpaid child support in an approximate amount of $39,000.00.  Before the $338 million in lottery funds are released to him, it seems that the State of New Jersey will deduct the amounts owed for his child support obligations.  See http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/28/17504063-winner-of-338-million-powerball-jackpot-owes-29000-in-child-support?lite

And, in another twist of fate, Mr. Quezada’s winnings may trigger a financial review that could result in an increase to his current monthly child support obligations.  It wouldn’t be the first time – in 1995, a Chicago resident found his child support obligation increased and had the funds withheld from his lottery winnings. See http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1995-09-26/news/9509260083_1_lottery-ticket-illinois-state-lottery-lottery-windfall

In 1999, Amador Granados’ former spouse successfully sued for an increase in child support after he won the $11 million SuperLotto in California; she subsequently obtained a court order to seize his annual lottery payments when Mr. Granados defaulted on his child support obligations.  See http://articles.latimes.com/1999/apr/20/local/me-29209.

Lesson learned – income from gambling (including state-supported lotteries) is still income and will be included in the calculation of one’s resources when determining the amount of child support.  In Texas, it’s the law: See Texas Administrative Code Rule § 401.319 - http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=16&pt=9&ch=401&rl=319. 

By:      Cynthia W. Veidt

Friday, September 6, 2013

Putting a “Cap” on Child Support in Texas

Many people believe that there is a statutory “cap” or maximum amount of child support permitted under Texas law.  This belief is only partially correct.

Texas has enacted statutory guidelines which apply various percentages – depending on the number of children the parent must support – but only to the first $8,550.00 of an obligor’s monthly net resources. See Tex. Fam. Code §§ 154.125 et seq. (before Sept. 1, 2013, the percentages were applied only to the first $7,500).

So, for example, if you receive annual income of more than $102,600.00, your income in excess of that “cap” is not included in determining the amount of child support presumptively owed under Texas statutory guidelines.

However, as mentioned in a previous topic in this blog series, Texas has given its courts some discretion in deciding whether to vary from the “guidelines” amount of child support. As a result, it is possible for a court to determine that an obligor owes additional child support above the presumptive amount in a specific case.

To exceed this statutory “cap,” the court must determine that the child’s “proven needs” exceed the presumptive amount of child support under Texas guidelines. Here, the child’s “needs” are based on the parties’ circumstances and are not limited to basic necessities such as food, shelter or clothing. For example, Texas courts have found that a child’s proven needs may include private school tuition, personal bodyguards, a nanny, music lessons and international travel, based on the family’s lifestyle and particular circumstances.

Another limitation, of sorts, exists under Section 158.009 of the Texas Family Code, which states that no order or writ may direct that an employer withhold more than 50% of an obligor’s disposable earnings. This statute does not limit the amount of child support the obligor may owe, it merely limits the amounts which can be withheld from earnings to satisfy the obligor’s child support obligations. When those obligations exceed the amount that can be withheld from earnings, the obligor remains liable for the unpaid amounts and may begin to accrue arrearages which could extend child support obligations for several years (or lead to other adverse consequences through enforcement actions). In these circumstances, an obligor should consider petitioning the court to modify his or her child support obligations to a level more consistent with the obligor’s current net resources.

By:  Cynthia W. Veidt

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Deviating from Texas Child Support Guidelines



The amount of child support based on the statutory percentage applied to an obligor’s monthly net resources is presumptive, but a court may vary from the guidelines amount – upward or downward – based on a number of different factors.

Relevant factors (not an exhaustive list) may include:


  • The age and needs of the child;
  • The child’s educational expenses beyond secondary school;
  • Payment of health insurance or uninsured medical expenses for the child;
  • Extraordinary educational, healthcare or other expenses of the parents or the child
  • Whether either parent has managing conservatorship or possession of another child;
  • Each party’s period of possession of and access to the child;
  • Travel costs for exercising possession of and access to the child;
  • Child care expenses;
  • Each parent’s respective ability to contribute to the child’s support;
  • Debts assumed by either parent;
  • The net resources of the obligee (the parent receiving child support); or
  • The amount of alimony or spousal maintenance paid  or received by a parent.


The court has broad discretion to vary from the amount of child support under Texas statutory guidelines for any reason it finds in the child’s best interest.  As a result, variation from the Texas statutory guidelines is not automatic, although courts are encouraged to consider the totality of circumstances of the child and the parents in reaching a decision concerning the amount of child support in each case.

By:  Cynthia W. Veidt, Attorney

Friday, February 22, 2013

Applying Texas Child Support Guidelines to My “Net Resources”



Once you have determined your “monthly net resources” by adding all sources of income or assets you receive in a year, divided by twelve, and deducting the permitted items, you must next determine what percentage of those monthly net resources should be paid as child support.

Texas has two different charts for determining the appropriate percentage – one applies when all of the obligor’s children who require support live in one household.  The other chart applies when the obligor has children living in more than one household.

So, for example, if you have one child, the amount of your child support for that child would be 20% of your monthly net resources under Section 154.125 of the Texas Family Code (as of 2012). 

However, if you had one child (Albert) living in one household, and a second child (Beth) living in another household, the amount of your child support for Albert would be 17.5% of your monthly net resources, under the chart set forth in Section 154.129 of the Texas Family Code, because you would receive a credit for child support that you owe to Beth.

Obviously, things become very complicated very quickly if you have multiple children living in many different households. In these situations, it is a good idea to consult with a family lawyer to help you determine what amounts of child support you would owe to each individual child under Texas’ statutory guidelines.